Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Film Photography
soompi forums > soompi interests > tech > mp3 and digital cameras
Pages: 1, 2
kenn
FILM fiLm FILm fiLM
w00t.gif w00t.gif w00t.gif
LET'S DOWN TO BUSINESS


so basically, i wanted to start a thread for film camera lovers
and this thread can be used for reviewing your slr, ask for help,
talk about lomography and polaroids, ask what is the best film to use,
or anything you are curious about

so let me start off smile.gif
does anyone have the Minolta SRT 101 or 201?

(such a sexy camera!)
i wanna know how well this camera works
and if its a very functional and easy to use slr?
MINJI.v
I have a Canon EOS ELAN 7NE. I've only had it for a month or so, so I can't say much but I do love it. Only took about 3 rolls of pictures so far ^^;;;;
kenn
^ ohmy.gif! that is a pretty fly camera
i havent really used my automatic slr yet
i am stuck using the old old cameras cause i am still a newbie to photography

i must ask, which do you prefer MINJI.v, film or digital?
MINJI.v
That's a pretty difficult question. They both have their ups and downs. I like the photographs I take from film better than digital but DSLRs are so much more functional and practical. Also buying and developing film can be a bit of a hassle as well as costly. Plus my DSLR body is not as good as my film body (since DSLRs are more expensive) but that will change soon... ^^

That must be the least straightforward answer to a question since... ever O_O
kelvin6
To the original poster: The old SLRs are pretty easy to use, once you know what the aperture and shutter speed controls are. You will also know how to use the camera's built in light meter too... to know if your settings are set for optimal exposure.

I personally would recommend this camera, for its small size and weight and its incredible metering system in automatic mode (when you want to be lazy) and its simple and ergonomic design (making a shutter speed ring at the base of the lens mount so focus, aperture and shutter speed can be adjusted by one hand quickly).

The Olympus OM-2



This is how I like to think of films:

Film is an art of non-linearity whereas digita is a art of linearity.

Film is often choosen based on their speeds (which controls the grain size on the film), contrast (subfactor: latitude), and color saturation (for color film). Film is often choosen this way because unlike digital capture, the film in non linear. Each film has strengths and weaknesses when compared to other films. For instance, for outdoor festival events I would choose Kodak Ultra Color series film (such as Kodak UC400), because it has rich color saturation and very good contrast. Now if I was shooting outdoor portraits for like wedding shoot , I would use Fujifilm NPH series, because of its lower color saturation and softer contrast (low contrast).

In a digital world, the image is captured via a CCD sensor, and is thus stored for post processing. A CCD sensor captures the image in a linear way, unlike film where we have to pick it based on its characteristics. A CCD doesn't come preset with its own color saturation, contrast, or speed, although you can adjust the camera to modify the capture, it generally captures all the images in the same fashion, with the same color saturation, contrast and speed, etc. (if you look at it in a basic way). To achieve certain effects on the image it is done post processing (Photoshop).

Although film is fading away in this digital world, it does have some applications where digital isn't the norm (or not yet).
-Astronomy photography or just plain taking pictures of the starry sky. Digital cameras can only hold a shutter open as long as the battery lasts... which will be drained as the camera's CPU is running awol trying to figure out when to stop the exposure. Old film SLRs when used in a manual mode can be locked (using a release cable) to do hours if needed of keeping that shutter open to capture that night sky.

-Criminal Justice, film is generally still the norm, it is incredibly hard to fake or 'photoshop' a image to falsify evidence or data. Although Canon does offer some hardware inconjunction with their DSLRs to put proper locks and signatures on images to prevent modification.

-Disposable cameras. Well there are disposable digital cameras, but they don't yet match up to the image quality of a film disposable camera. Nor does the price tag of a film disposable camera. As long as there are disposable digital cameras people will find ways to hack and reuse them as regular cameras, which makes it a loss of profit to the manufacturer and thus increasing the price of the camera.

-Teaching Basic Photography. Film is still the best way to teach basic photography skills and light capture theory. Make sure you know film before you go to digital. I personally learned by using a older film SLR how to select aperture and shutter speed (which is sometimes called a technique), based on the shooting enviroment's light level, WITHOUT using a light meter and getting (about 90% of the time on 400 speed film) a proper or near optimal exposure. I'm a human light meter tongue.gif . I learned these techniques and what to use in varying lighting situations, due to repetition and looking and remembering the aperture and shutter speed used. Its a useful skill to at least get you into a ballpark 'technique' for proper exposure... like when your light meter fails. Also with film is that you waste film if you don't get the shot right the first time... which also taught me to frame quickly, focus quickly and quickly anticipate the shot to get it right the first time around. No i'm not perfect but at least i minimize my repeats...


I currently do own a digital camera (not quite a SLR, but more of a prosumer camera) and a several film SLRs. I don't use my film SLRs as much but I do prefer to use it in certain situations and when I want to use it for nostalgic reasons.
kenn
AHH! wait do you have that SLR?
cause my friend was trying to sell me that camera
for two hundred, which i thought was a waste
cause right now i have the Nikon Nikkormat FTN, Pentax K1000, and Mamiya 1000DTL but the the pentax and mamiya is still coming in the mail
and each of those cameras were 75 bucks and lower


which slrs do you have kelvin6? ohmy.gif
Tepper
I've got a minolta XD11 =/ sooo bulletproof.

I almost have to say I prefer film (B&W) over digital for portrait photography.
kenn
^ohmy.gif!!!!! i always wanted that minolta!
i went to this pawn shop and i saw that baby
and i was like
omg omg i want i want!
but when i asked for the guy to bring it down
the leather was falling apart and it was beat up
and i was like
argh damnit i guess i have to pass this up
i heard that XD-11 was one of the best cameras minolta ever made ohmy.gif!

i just ended up getting this honeybun


but i am still determined to get a minolta! ya ya yaaaa
SkeptiCal
I want to get a SLR soon, maybe for Christmas? :]
Eh, the only thing I'm scared of is the amount of money I'll waste on film and photo paper-_-
Tepper
QUOTE (kenn @ Dec 3 2007, 06:30 PM) *
^ ohmy.gif !!!!! i always wanted that minolta!
i went to this pawn shop and i saw that baby
and i was like
omg omg i want i want!
but when i asked for the guy to bring it down
the leather was falling apart and it was beat up
and i was like
argh damnit i guess i have to pass this up
i heard that XD-11 was one of the best cameras minolta ever made ohmy.gif !

i just ended up getting this honeybun


but i am still determined to get a minolta! ya ya yaaaa

LoL ya the XD-11 was my dads, but he's long past his day of even taking snapshots with it, so it just took it, it's really good for being almost 30 years old now. (And I dropped it on the sidewalk while trying to fidget with something)
One of my friends has a nikkormat and I must say, that thing is a friggin brick. So awesome when the shutter releases you don't even feel any recoil or torquing it's so nice. And that thing is like what, 40 years old now?
kelvin6
Here is my family of cameras: (pardon the white balance)



This is my first SLR, apparently my dad thought he destroyed it 22 years ago... when he thought it failed. Apparently my mom kept it and stored it (before I was born) and I found it cleaning out stuff with my mom... popped in new batteries and the camera returned to operation. Looks like NEW and works flawlessly. Amazing 31 year old camera, even does TTL Flash metering and control and OTF (off-the-film) dynamic light metering, resulting in a very powerful auto mode of its time. Meet the Olympus OM-2:








This is my second SLR, I picked it up on ebay a few years ago for $20, this camera is just as good as the OM-2, well almost and is fully compatible with nearly all OM-series lens and accessories. Great deal if you can get one on ebay, much cheaper and more powerful than many other well known similiar cameras out there. This is my regular use film camera (if and when I use it). Meet the Olympus OM-PC (OM-40):


This is my third SLR. I cannot bear to get anything else besides another Olympus SLR, so I had to pick it up when the price was right. Unfortuantely the light meter failed and have to rely on instincts and guesses for manual mode usage, aperture priority automatic and program modes work great. Meet the Olympus OM-2SP:



I also had a fourth Olympus SLR, the Olympus OM-G (omg! its a OM-G tongue.gif ) but that is now with my GF for her to use.


This is my prized Olympus OM-2 with outfitted with some gear (a motor drive, and a giant blind Vivitar 5200 flash (does TTL flash control)):



and before I forget, meet the ENTIRE family:

kenn
Tepper:
yeah the nikkormat sure is heavy... when people want to see it, i have to tell them to use two hands just to make sure they wont drop it
is the minolta XD-11 your only slr, Tepper? or do you have more? ohmy.gif if so, do share smile.gif

kelvin6:
............ wacko.gif
omg...... your cameras are SEXY omgahhh
31 years old?!?! it doesnt even look that old
how are those vivitar flashses? do they work fine?
kelvin6
The Vivitar flashes are great, even better than the Olympus ones. The Vivitar 5200 and 5600 are TTL Flash compatible, meaning with the right module, they can be suited for different cameras. They also can perform auto (in flash 'TTL') when you have a camera that cannot support TTL. The vivitar flash i purchased on ebay for cheap and got the corresponding module (PM/O) to go with it. If you want to stick to a tried and true manual power flash, the Vivitar 283 or 285HV are the best ones out there. Vivitar used to be a very reputable flash maker.

The OM2 has been recently devalued for some reason (hint: digital) and can be bought for very cheap (http://cgi.ebay.com/Olympus-OM2_W0QQitemZ140184220532QQihZ004QQcategoryZ15239QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZVi
ewItem), this camera is a manual and auto-exposure camera, featuring some very innovative technologies of its time (its rival was the Canon AE-1), featuring TTL exposure, the camera has a light sensor (two actually) mounted on the floor of the mirror box and can read the reflecting light off the film (OTF), thus if the camera had determined a shutter speed (with the corresponding aperture) prior to the exposure, it has the ability to dynamically change it (Shutter speed) while the image is still being exposed leading to a good exposure almost all the time. The camera can also be operated with it in the OFF position (with a 1/60 shutter speed and whatever the aperture is set to) to be able to capture sudden moments, where flipping the switch would've wasted precious time.

Check out the Olympus OM series, its worth looking at. I've used numerious film SLRs (older ones) and I personally love the olympus for its small size and weight and its innovative technologies (I love the air dampened mirror and shutter system, so soft and quiet exposure).

http://olympus.dementia.org/eSIF/om-sif.htm







iamsars
^so wat camera did u use to take the picture of those cameras? lol
kelvin6
The camera used to take the SLR pics, was a Nikon Coolpix 5400, using the Vivitar 5200 flash unit (as seen with the Lumiquest Ultrabounce flash diffuser) on a TTL extender cable (and i'm holding the flash... for some shots). Not all the pics have flash, because some have the flash unit in the picture...lol and the built in camera one sucks...

Some of the OM2 pictures were done with a older Nikon Coolpix 2100, shot at an earlier date.

Not to offend certain camera users out there, but i don't see myself as a Canon user at all. I even had a tough time even thinking of getting Nikon digital cameras, I just loved being a Olympus fan... being different from the crowd.
Tepper
Ya, the minolta is the only film slr I have and the only lens I have for it is the kit 50mm, but that's gotten me some fine pictures for my photography schoolwork junk. I do have a digital slr (nikon d70s) and a couple ancient point and shoot digitals. I lost my 10 year old film point and shoot a long time ago..
DE LINNERZ
yay i'm glad someone started a thread for this. lol. i just recently bought a canon rebel g. got it for $105 off ebay. so far i've only been randomly using it, but so far i really like it.


Haneul-


I used a Canon AE-1 Program. Actually I still use it, when I have to take pictures of events and such. It's pretty good. The quality of the photos turned out better than the digital camera my aunt and uncle used for their wedding.
robotic
^ I also have a Canon AE-1 Program. It was my dad's since 1981.
It's built like a tank and takes good quality shots.
It's fun to play with when I'm not with my Nikon D80.

Great camera.

AE-1P with Canon 50mm f/1.4
kenn
oh my kelvin6! that is so much! O_O
sigh... i give up on ebay auctioning...
i tried SIX TIMES before i actually won a SLR
goodness
i would so buy that olympus but i am broke!
i saw my friend's olympus OM-2
OH MY! WHATTA BEAUT
i seriously wanted to jack it from him

sigh since everyone is showing off their cameras
i might as well also smile.gif
EH HEH HEH

Nikon Nikkormat FTN


Minolta Maxxum 5 with quantaray macro lenses


Pentax K1000 (ULTIMATE STUDENT CAMERA, THIS IS A PERFECT MANUAL SLR TO USE FOR BEGINNERS!)


Mamiya/Sekor 1000 DTL


i cant wait to get my pentax and mamiya in the mail ^^
SkeptiCal
I got a Minolta SRT MC-II the other day:]
I told my mom that I was planning to buy an SLR and she told me not to waste money and to use hers instead. I didn't even know she had one tongue.gif

Well anywho, now all I need is a new battery and some film! yay:]
alicimoo
QUOTE (SkeptiCal @ Dec 7 2007, 07:48 PM) *
I got a Minolta SRT MC-II the other day:]
I told my mom that I was planning to buy an SLR and she told me not to waste money and to use hers instead. I didn't even know she had one tongue.gif

Well anywho, now all I need is a new battery and some film! yay:]

LOL. That's like me!

I asked my dad to consider buying me a DSLR camera. He told me he didn't "trust me" (as in my fluctuating interests), and didn't want to get me such an expensive camera. So he told me I could play around with his old camera.


sweatingbullets.gif
kelvin6
I keep forgetting to note that some older cameras of the 70's and even into the 80's use a out of date battery that cannot be replaced, the PX625 mercury battery. There are batteries that fit the slot (namely SR44 or 357) but can potentially fry the internal light meter and/or provide inaccurate readings. Unlike today's cameras, which are heavy battery draining devices, these older cameras draw so little power from the batteries that they can last a year or more on just a set of small button cell batteries.

The reason why I bring up this point about older camera batteries is that I don't want to see anyone buy a camera and not be able to utilize all its functions. For example, I never recommended the Olympus OM-1, although its a great reliable camera, as its a fully manual camera with an independent light meter (which how lots of manual cameras are made), I cannot recommend it because of the lack of a proper battery replacement, and even though there are modifications available, the meter will never be as accurate as it could be with the original, no longer found (or manufactured) battery. A recalibration (to the mod alone might cost several times over the worth of the camera.

Check the battery used in the camera before making a purchase of a older camera. Make sure its common, such as a LR44, SR44, 357 and so on. PX625 is common back then, but try to stay away from these, unless you don't need a light meter.
kenn
^really? ohmy.gif
cause recently i went to go buy a battery for my nikkormat and it uses the px625 mercury battery
so i went to wolfe camera in search of the battery and i found this


thank god i found this battery if not, i would be screwed cause i depend on the light meter so much
mia1981
it's a nice camera for sure, but the only thing is that,,,
minolta went out of business a few years back and sony took over.
it's VERY HARD to get parts if anything goes wrong with ur camera.
especially the classics, so when ur using it, be extra careful.
this is what i have:



with a 50mm f/1.4 lens

this camera is more than 30 years old =D
i love it
kelvin6
^^^ Kenn, that battery is a replacement for the PX625, its not actually the PX625. The Wien battery is a Zinc-Air cell, which tend to be short lived (when exposed to air, like when removed from packaging) from numerious reports, and its pretty costly $4-5 per battery. Good thing you brought that up, I nearly about the Wien cell battery. Actually the PX625 might still be for sale in Asia and maybe europe, because the ban for mercury batteries may or maynot have taken place yet.

There is such a thing as a adapter to use more common batteries called a MR9 adapter, but this is just a cheap hack that will result in the light meter being off (not too much tho).

Xarthan
QUOTE (mia1981 @ Dec 11 2007, 06:30 AM) *
it's a nice camera for sure, but the only thing is that,,,
minolta went out of business a few years back and sony took over.
it's VERY HARD to get parts if anything goes wrong with ur camera.
especially the classics, so when ur using it, be extra careful.
this is what i have:



with a 50mm f/1.4 lens

this camera is more than 30 years old =D
i love it


hey my dad has the same camera. I think he bought it around the time i was born.
Haneul-
^ I have the same camera. XD Canon AE-1 Program. Oh gosh I love it. Takes some nice pictures. Been in the family for how long. Mom gave it to me. So I'm all happy.
SkeptiCal
QUOTE (alicimoo @ Dec 10 2007, 07:09 PM) *
LOL. That's like me!

I asked my dad to consider buying me a DSLR camera. He told me he didn't "trust me" (as in my fluctuating interests), and didn't want to get me such an expensive camera. So he told me I could play around with his old camera.


sweatingbullets.gif

:] Like your dad, I don't trust myself because I get interested in different things too easily. But I did have photography last year (plan to take photography 3/4 next year or the year after) and besides hating my teacher, everything was all gravy.
I wanted a DSLR too but there's no way I'm going to pay that much for a camera right now, nor do I want my parents to buy it for me. Maybe in a year or two:)

QUOTE (kelvin6 @ Dec 10 2007, 08:27 PM) *
I keep forgetting to note that some older cameras of the 70's and even into the 80's use a out of date battery that cannot be replaced, the PX625 mercury battery. There are batteries that fit the slot (namely SR44 or 357) but can potentially fry the internal light meter and/or provide inaccurate readings. Unlike today's cameras, which are heavy battery draining devices, these older cameras draw so little power from the batteries that they can last a year or more on just a set of small button cell batteries.

The reason why I bring up this point about older camera batteries is that I don't want to see anyone buy a camera and not be able to utilize all its functions. For example, I never recommended the Olympus OM-1, although its a great reliable camera, as its a fully manual camera with an independent light meter (which how lots of manual cameras are made), I cannot recommend it because of the lack of a proper battery replacement, and even though there are modifications available, the meter will never be as accurate as it could be with the original, no longer found (or manufactured) battery. A recalibration (to the mod alone might cost several times over the worth of the camera.

Check the battery used in the camera before making a purchase of a older camera. Make sure its common, such as a LR44, SR44, 357 and so on. PX625 is common back then, but try to stay away from these, unless you don't need a light meter.

tears.gif <- that's what I felt when I read this. But I figure I'll use what Kenn bought, even if it is short lived. I guess I'll just have to take as many pictures as I can before it dies on me:P Thanks for the info btw.

QUOTE (mia1981 @ Dec 11 2007, 06:30 AM) *
it's a nice camera for sure, but the only thing is that,,,
minolta went out of business a few years back and sony took over.
it's VERY HARD to get parts if anything goes wrong with ur camera.
especially the classics, so when ur using it, be extra careful.
this is what i have:



with a 50mm f/1.4 lens

this camera is more than 30 years old =D
i love it

I was considering getting this camera before I knew my mom had one. Maybe it'll be my next camera:D
alicimoo
QUOTE (SkeptiCal @ Dec 11 2007, 11:27 PM) *
:] Like your dad, I don't trust myself because I get interested in different things too easily. But I did have photography last year (plan to take photography 3/4 next year or the year after) and besides hating my teacher, everything was all gravy.
I wanted a DSLR too but there's no way I'm going to pay that much for a camera right now, nor do I want my parents to buy it for me. Maybe in a year or two:)

Yea, I do get interested in a lot of stuff. But mainly, I can't pursue them because junior year's..argh.
Too bad my school doesn't have photography class, only photography club. =/ It'd be a fun class to take.
I'm gonna save up to get a DLSR camera. If I'm still interested in 1 year, I'll go and get one, if not, at least I'll have an extra stash of money around. tongue.gif

I'm gonna go out and take some shots with my dad's camera once I get film and batteries. :]
alicee
I have a Canon EOS Elan 7E~ I'm using it for my photography
class right now. It's a very good camera IMO~ I don't know too
much about camera's though >_< Still need to read up more on
mine!

Today we were developing film in class, and my film was ruined
since I rolled it on the reel too tightly x_x OMG, I was so mad T.T

I hate rolling on film.. x_x
kelvin6
QUOTE (SkeptiCal @ Dec 11 2007, 08:27 PM) *
tears.gif <- that's what I felt when I read this. But I figure I'll use what Kenn bought, even if it is short lived. I guess I'll just have to take as many pictures as I can before it dies on me:P Thanks for the info btw.


Get a Olympus OM Series camera... just anything but a Olympus OM-1 if batteries and functionality is your concern. The olympus OM-2 or OM-PC are pretty low cost on ebay... yet great cameras of its time. My days of serious photography are done... sorry I won't sell my cameras.
felinewong
i suddenly have an urge to shoot a few rolls of film
keirasketch
I'm considering getting a used Pentax MX from ebay with a 1:4 50mm lens.
Any one own this one?
do you guys recommend any other accessories/lens for it?
ra123
QUOTE (SkeptiCal @ Dec 11 2007, 06:27 PM) *
:] Like your dad, I don't trust myself because I get interested in different things too easily. But I did have photography last year (plan to take photography 3/4 next year or the year after) and besides hating my teacher, everything was all gravy.
I wanted a DSLR too but there's no way I'm going to pay that much for a camera right now, nor do I want my parents to buy it for me. Maybe in a year or two:)


tears.gif <- that's what I felt when I read this. But I figure I'll use what Kenn bought, even if it is short lived. I guess I'll just have to take as many pictures as I can before it dies on me:P Thanks for the info btw.


I was considering getting this camera before I knew my mom had one. Maybe it'll be my next camera:D



Weeee I have the canon ae-1 too. Anyone shoot in a format larger then 35mm? I'm thinking of buying one of those ranger finders from ebay. Any experiences?
miranduh
QUOTE (felinewong @ Dec 13 2007, 12:22 AM) *
i suddenly have an urge to shoot a few rolls of film

same

but not having a darkroom sucks big butt. sad.gif

I always feel like a loser when i come into these threads and know nothing around brands, everyone is so expert at this! smile.gif

for film photography, i used like a noname camera i kept borrowing from school
but it still worked fine, to sadly other people didn't keep the cameras in good quality but thank god my teacher actually had a passion for this and knew how to fix everything! ahd she took some pictures which blew me away
she took a picture of a white horse against a barn + a broken fence and it looked sooo magical/amazing
just imagine it haha ph34r.gif


just wanted to say i'm glad this is still around =) i love film photography, the contrast and details you can get from a film camera is like 100x better than a digital camera
and the fun thing is that you have to look through the lens thinking to yourself in black and white
(well to me only, since for film, i use b/w film only since my school only had chemicals for b/w)

& also, b/w on digital just can't compare sweatingbullets.gif so grey sleep.gif

sorry im just rambling ahha

show some pictures!
xkrnbabiix
i'm currently using a minolta maxxum 5000 with a tamron af(90-300mm) it's hugeeeee. it used to be my dad's but i stole it for my photography class. it gives me pretty nice black and white(for school) shots but it like roars, it's so loud.
i love developing my own pictures. it's so fun and being in the darkroom is so peaceful.
thinking about getting a nikon d-40 in maybe like a year or so.
onhotwires
How many of you guys have your own darkroom/where do you go to develop your pictures?

XP I'm such a noob at this, the last time I developed film was when I was 10.

My school only has digital photography classes, where we were mostly taught how to photoshop pictures rather than learn how to work/adjust the nice DSLR's that it actually had. So, no darkrooms there. =[
felinewong
i just go to a local lab in town, its so much faster and better than developing the film on my own
kelvin6
Few years back I was still developing b/w film in my bathroom...lol. I would then go to school to use their darkroom for 'printing' the images. I still have the black bag (for film extraction/loading), the developing tank, thermometer for chemical temps, and other various tools. I tossed the chemicals as I don't want to risk my baby/toddler nephew finding them...

My dad was even more hard-core than I was, he even rigged up a darkroom and had tanks, enlarger, etc... those days are long gone sadly.

ra123
QUOTE (onhotwires @ Feb 20 2008, 08:04 PM) *
How many of you guys have your own darkroom/where do you go to develop your pictures?

XP I'm such a noob at this, the last time I developed film was when I was 10.

My school only has digital photography classes, where we were mostly taught how to photoshop pictures rather than learn how to work/adjust the nice DSLR's that it actually had. So, no darkrooms there. =[


Photo labs give you the conveniency of having your film rolls developed by you or by a professional. Otherwise there are nearby schools that have night labs which can serve as a good and very cheap alternative.
kelvin6
I would never develop color negatives at home. There is too much work and too much room for error. I don't think I can stand processing the chemicals (which require a very warm environment and chemical temp), and the timing of the chemicals in and out must be very precise. In fact at my college, they don't even do color processing by hand anymore, its been just loading it into a automated processor and let it do its job.

I rather much just take my films to a lab to get processed and printed (if I decide not to get the film scanned). Plus the labs tend to be very consistant. There is a local one that I take it to where I can have special options done, like pushing and pulling the exposure, etc.





joonage
Hmm ... I was watching Mythbusters yesterday and they were doing like McGyver myths ...

One was where you could develop film with household products ...

I think it was using OJ as the developer and Ammonium as the fixer. Something like that ... All while under a black trash bag.

I doubt it works, but it's quite interesting.
xshrleywhirly


I always prefer film over digital ^^

this is my lovely baby. pretty old. i got it from my dad on valentine's day. lol. it's really really heavy. but i still adore it a lot! and it takes awesome pictures!
pseudobread
I too am a proud owner of the Canon AE-1 which I received, shockingly, from my dad.
I love it!
If you would like to see the manual for this camera (and many others), canonfd.com is a good resource.
cRoSsTaGe
I'm sorta a newbie playing around with cameras but I don't own a analog camera my ownself. Can anyone suggest anyone cameras to buy and what are the prices rigth now? I'm thinking of buying either a Nikon or Minolta one.
MINJI.v
QUOTE (cRoSsTaGe @ Mar 3 2008, 08:12 AM) *
I'm sorta a newbie playing around with cameras but I don't own a analog camera my ownself. Can anyone suggest anyone cameras to buy and what are the prices rigth now? I'm thinking of buying either a Nikon or Minolta one.

By analog, do you mean film? Anyway it depends on your price range - you could buy a used manual focus film camera from the olden days for a cheap price on eBay (at the most, $200) or get a more recent film SLR camera with autofocus for a higher price. I think a good manual focus film camera from Nikon is something from the FM series. My friend has an EM, older than the FM, and it takes great pictures.
cRoSsTaGe
Thanks and yeah, I was trying to say film cameras.
canonsx100
i recommend Canon A650 digital camera
tOasty
I'm pretty new to film photography, but here's what I have. Say hello to my babies:







And coming soon:



I'm nearing the end of my first rolls of film on the Diana and Nikon and I'm pretty excited(:
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.