QUOTE(Evil_Monkey666 @ Nov 22 2005, 03:39 PM) [snapback]777823[/snapback]
Tell me the last time you could play PC quality games on a console?
What I read this line "Tell me the last time you could play PC quality games on a console?" I don't see the hype with graphics at all (yes the quality of it). Well in general about graphics though. It doesn't have to be that realistic. BUT this is my opinion, I personally don't care about graphics quality, but enough so I can see that "oh its a cat or it's a sword". If the future is base on graphics then you might as well look at completely airbrushed perfect women in magazines. - Oh wait it''s already like that. I don't mind if people put graphics high on their list because that's how some people like it. I don't think it should be solely based on it. Beside the PC is like the ultimate "console system" it's great to compare with it at times, but you can't always.. since technology is just constantly changing x.x. And they make consoles like every two years or something.
Anyways I think the launch is great.. but really I don't think it will sell so well. In the words of Theodore Roosevelt there are two kinds of victory, initial victory and final victory (OK so I quote it wrong and maybe got the wrong person, you get the idea). Sure the 360 has a great jump start on the market since PS2 and GC was like that last year. BUT Sony and GC had a history of video games already. So with the 360 launch.. I do think it will be sold out, but think how much would be sold back? How many people will realize it's just a waste after? I think Microsoft THINKS by getting this jumpstart they will get the most popularity or something (MOST sales)..
Cultures are different, from people I'm surrounded with (or I see) they want that mature 'cool/popular 'stuff so they turn to Xbox or PS2. How society is into what is cool, would turn to that what people play most without even playing. They turn to what is cool and how would they know what's cool? By looking at the graphics. I think that what sets a factor in Microsoft's success of the 360. That could make the 360 possibly to its 3 million mark. Also the fact since it's near the holidays, but what does December 25 make out to the Japanese, Europeans, Asians, Mexicans, Lationos, Canadians? "Oh time for Americans to spend money for their love ones = GOOD BUSINESS".
If you want to sell them all out at the same time, it would be a better view to which system would sell the most, but because of Microsoft's head start, it's somewhat inaccurate in the end to compare the three systems.
TO MY POINT: 360 looks like it has a succesful launch, but I wouldn't want to say it "won the war". They have a huge fan base. Revolution.. well Nintendo's stragety is going low for systems and having a lot of money spend on everything else. At least that's what it appears to be. I just want to find what system would be great for gameplay with a nice library of it.
The Xbox's library wasn't even much to look at and I can say the same for Gamecube (man all those Zelda games on there.. I'm so happy Twlight Princess is coming), but GC, I think, had MORE popularity with its background and all. I mean if Revolutiom did get most of the popular 3rd parties, that is something worth watching. The library, I'm hopeing will be great, not some flux or half-put job --thinks back on FF:CC--.
Even if the 360 had a decent amount of games, interest seems to lurk more towards Revolution with it's umm "innovative" idea. And Sony has their base of 3rd parties to support them. I think they be more busy with them than 360. The only game I would applaud is DOA4. What games would be so great on 360 worth getting? Halo 3? I think you'd find that PC too later on.. I think it will entertain people just for a couple of months until something more unique or cool comes up (personally I don't think anything really will, but who knows).
I thought the 360 was already going to have a price drop? From what I think (if they did have a price drop) it would be lack of sales I think. So I guess they can reach that 3 mil with inexpensive systems..
.. I'm curious to see how Revolution and PS3 will turn out. The boomarang controller from Sony with it's grill-like system and Revolution's look a like DVD player with it's REMOTE controller. it's like fans vs uniqueness. Sony has its long time supporter as of Nintendo. BUT Nintendo, with the GameCube just somewhat killed it and the fact Xbox came out and PS2's huge popularity. It made a flux?
Now I'm hopeing Nintendo makes some kind of comeback. They've been excluded from most topics, whether it is because of it's unknown specs or because "PS2 and Xbox r KOOL" or people aren't familar with the old schoolness of it, it doesn't seem worth arguing about Sony and M$ if no one has a more valid say on Nintendo's part. Seriously it just seems that's all it is is graphics, people won't like Gamecube because of its appeal to EVERYONE (little kids and girls) therefore getting some exlclusion in the "big mature kids world". Anyways GC sucked IMO, just that system with the games well just not as appealing as Sony's. The games were all right, but I wish it was better like SNES or 64. People tend to look for the graphics and "what cool games are there". Gamecube lacked those IN. A. WAY. The culture in America (mainstream wise) is everything I hear is GRAPHICS GRAPHICS GRAPHICS(looks), are we that superfical? Does everything have to look soooo great? Is that how everyone suppose to know about different consoles base on which is better? /end personal vent
BTW I have to agree FF's games are just getting um... not repetitive, just the quality (gameplay storyline wise) of the game is worse. Go old school for gooodness sakes. I want to even say some of the old-school 2-D! games are better than the ones today. It may not be graphics that are so real you can't tell if it's a real person or a cg one, but I love playing those 2D games for hours.
In the end.. I have to hand it to Microsoft.. coming "late into the console" world and using their speciality (well the computer which has the internet) of the online community and attracting them to a console. Since the majority of gaming came from Japan, Microsoft coming out of motherboard and making games, competiting with the long time game industry of Nintendo and Sony (gaming wise). I just find that thought to be interesting.
Also to the above post.. I thought Sony's PS3 is more powerful than M$'s 360? And more like Sony watching how the 360's sales are doing? They would be compared nonetheless though.